The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained considerable traction in geological and environmental circles as a proposed new epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Unlike previous epochs, which were demarcated by natural phenomena such as glacial shifts or asteroid impacts, the Anthropocene is characterized by markers including plastic pollution, nuclear fallout residues, and elevated carbon dioxide levels. However, its formal recognition remains contentious. Some scholars argue that the term oversimplifies the complex and uneven responsibilities of different societies, while others contend that it distracts from the need for targeted policy interventions by implying a universal human agency. Proponents, conversely, maintain that the epoch serves as a powerful heuristic device, compelling humanity to acknowledge its collective role in shaping planetary futures and fostering a sense of urgency in environmental discourse.
❓ 일부 학자들이 인류세의 공식 인정에 반대하는 주요 이유는 무엇인가?
A. 새로운 시대(epoch)를 규정하기에는 충분한 지질학적 증거가 부족하다.
B. 이는 모든 인간 사회에 환경 피해를 동등하게 귀속시키는 불공정한 태도이다.
C. 정책 개입에 너무 치중하고 있으며, 과학적 연구에는 덜 집중하고 있습니다.
D. 빙하 이동과 같은 자연적 지표를 포함하지 못한다.
✅ 正确答案
It unfairly attributes environmental damage to all human societies equally.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first