The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in organizational psychology as a measure of an individual's ability to function effectively in culturally diverse settings. Unlike emotional intelligence, which focuses on intrapersonal and interpersonal skills, CQ encompasses four distinct dimensions: metacognitive, cognitive, motivational, and behavioral. Metacognitive CQ refers to the conscious awareness of cultural assumptions during interactions, while cognitive CQ involves knowledge of norms and practices across cultures. Motivational CQ reflects the drive to adapt, and behavioral CQ is the capability to exhibit appropriate verbal and non-verbal actions. Research suggests that high CQ correlates with better job performance in multinational teams, yet critics argue that the construct overlaps with general cognitive ability and personality traits, questioning its discriminant validity. Nevertheless, CQ training programs have been adopted widely, though their long-term efficacy remains under debate.
❓ この文章によると、文化的知性(CQ)に対する主な批判を最もよく表しているのは次のうちどれか。
A. 感情知能とあまりにも似すぎていて、役に立たない。
B. それは一般的な認知能力や性格特性と区別されないかもしれません。
C. そのトレーニングプログラムは長期的には効果がありません。
D. 行動面に焦点を当てすぎており、知識を無視している。
✅ 正确答案
It may not be distinct from general cognitive ability and personality traits.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first