The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction in geological and environmental circles as a proposed new epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of human activity. However, critics contend that the term is more cultural than scientific, since the onset of human influence varies widely across regions and time periods, making a single global boundary difficult to establish. This debate underscores the challenge of defining geological time in an era where human actions are increasingly intertwined with natural processes.
❓ この文章によると、人新世を地質時代として捉えることに対する主な批判は何ですか？
A. A) それは物理的な証拠ではなく、文化的な指標にのみ依存している。
B. B) 世界的な出発点は地域ごとのばらつきがあるため、特定するのが難しい。
C. C) それは核降下物を過度に強調し、他の人為的影響を無視している。
D. D) この概念は広く受け入れられているが、科学的根拠を欠いている。
✅ 正确答案
B) The global starting point is hard to pinpoint due to regional variability.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first