The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction in geological and environmental circles as a proposed new epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of human activity. However, critics contend that the term is more cultural than scientific, since the onset of human influence varies widely across regions and time periods, making a single global boundary difficult to establish. This debate underscores the challenge of defining geological time in an era where human actions are increasingly intertwined with natural processes.
❓ Согласно тексту, какова основная критика антропоцена как геологической эпохи?
A. A) Он полностью опирается исключительно на культурные маркеры, а не на физические доказательства.
B. B) Глобальная отправная точка трудно поддаётся точному определению из-за региональных различий.
C. C) Он чрезмерно акцентирует внимание на радиоактивных осадках, игнорируя другие последствия для человека.
D. D) Эта концепция широко признана, но не имеет никакой научной основы.
✅ 正确答案
B) The global starting point is hard to pinpoint due to regional variability.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first