The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere constitute a distinct stratigraphic signature. However, critics contend that the term dilutes the precision of geological time scales, which traditionally rely on natural, not anthropogenic, phenomena. Moreover, they suggest that framing the current era as a geological epoch may inadvertently normalize the ongoing environmental degradation, as it implies an inevitable transition rather than a reversible crisis. This debate highlights the tension between scientific classification and its broader social and political implications, underscoring the need for interdisciplinary dialogue in addressing global environmental change.
❓ Какова основная причина, по которой критики выступают против термина «антропоцен» как геологической эпохи?
A. A. Он слишком много внимания уделяет природным явлениям, а не деятельности человека.
B. B. Это может представить экологический ущерб как неизбежный этап, а не как решаемую проблему.
C. C. Ему не хватает доказательств, таких как маркеры ядерных осадков и загрязнения пластиком.
D. D. Это игнорирует роль геологов в определении геологических временных шкал.
✅ 正确答案
B. It may make environmental damage seem like an unavoidable stage rather than a fixable problem.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first