The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere constitute a distinct stratigraphic signature. However, critics contend that the term dilutes the precision of geological time scales, which traditionally rely on natural, not anthropogenic, phenomena. Moreover, they suggest that framing the current era as a geological epoch may inadvertently normalize the ongoing environmental degradation, as it implies an inevitable transition rather than a reversible crisis. This debate highlights the tension between scientific classification and its broader social and political implications, underscoring the need for interdisciplinary dialogue in addressing global environmental change.
❓ 批評家が「人新世」を地質時代として反対する主な理由は何ですか?
A. A. 自然現象に焦点を当てすぎており、人間の活動にはあまり焦点を当てていない。
B. B. それは環境被害を、修正可能な問題ではなく避けられない段階のように見せてしまうかもしれない。
C. C. 核降下物やプラスチック汚染などの指標からの証拠が不足している。
D. D. それは、地質学者が地質時代尺度を定義する上での役割を無視している。
✅ 正确答案
B. It may make environmental damage seem like an unavoidable stage rather than a fixable problem.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first