The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere constitute a distinct stratigraphic signature. However, critics contend that the term dilutes the precision of geological time scales, which traditionally rely on natural, not anthropogenic, phenomena. Moreover, they suggest that framing the current era as a geological epoch may inadvertently normalize the ongoing environmental degradation, as it implies an inevitable transition rather than a reversible crisis. This debate highlights the tension between scientific classification and its broader social and political implications, underscoring the need for interdisciplinary dialogue in addressing global environmental change.
❓ 비평가들이 '인류세'를 지질학적 시대로 반대하는 주요 이유는 무엇인가?
A. A. 그것은 인간 활동보다 자연 현상에 너무 초점을 맞추고 있다.
B. B. 이는 환경 피해가 해결 가능한 문제라기보다는 피할 수 없는 단계처럼 보이게 만들 수 있다.
C. C. 핵 낙진 및 플라스틱 오염과 같은 지표로부터의 증거가 부족하다.
D. D. 지질학자들이 지질 시대 구분을 정의하는 역할을 무시한다.
✅ 正确答案
B. It may make environmental damage seem like an unavoidable stage rather than a fixable problem.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first