The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Unlike previous epochs, which were characterized by natural climatic shifts or biological events, the Anthropocene is marked by anthropogenic markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels. However, the formal recognition of this epoch remains contentious. Some scholars argue that the term oversimplifies the complex, uneven nature of human influence across different regions and time periods, while others contend that it provides a necessary framework for understanding humanity's role in shaping planetary processes. This debate highlights not only scientific questions about stratigraphic boundaries but also broader philosophical issues regarding the relationship between human agency and natural history.
❓ 인류세(Anthropocene)의 공식 인정을 둘러싼 논란의 주요 원인은 무엇인가?
A. A. 인간이 환경에 미치는 영향에 대한 과학적 증거의 부족.
B. B. 해당 용어는 시간과 공간에 걸쳐 변화하는 복잡한 인간의 영향을 제대로 포착하지 못한다.
C. C. 지질학자들은 이 시기의 정확한 시작 시점에 대해 의견이 일치하지 않는다.
D. D. 그 개념은 경험적 데이터보다 철학적 문제에 너무 치중되어 있다.
✅ 正确答案
B. The term fails to capture the varying and complex human influences over time and space.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first