第133篇 燕王谓苏代曰

出处:战国策·燕策三

语言: 中文 English Español 日本語 한국어 Tiếng Việt ไทย Русский

📜 原文(文言文)

燕王谓苏代曰:“寡人甚愿来,而恶多诈。今子言秦,若秦不听,子将若之何?”苏代对曰:“臣闻之,忠信者,士之高行也;而诈伪者,士之鄙行也。今臣之所言,非诈伪也。臣请为大王说秦,使秦无加兵于燕,而燕得重宝,臣之愿也。若秦不听臣,臣请以颈血溅大王之衣。”燕王曰:“善。”苏代遂之秦,说秦昭王曰:“臣闻之,明主不恶忠言,贤君不逆直谏。今燕王虽小,然其志大,且燕之强,足以自守。大王欲伐燕,恐诸侯有异心。莫若与燕和亲,使燕为东藩,共拒诸侯。如此,则秦无东顾之忧,而诸侯不敢窥秦。”秦昭王曰:“善。”乃罢兵,与燕和亲。

📖 白话文翻译

The King of Yan said to Su Dai, "I am eager to hear your strategy, yet I abhor excessive cunning. Now you speak of Qin—if Qin does not heed your counsel, what will you do?" Su Dai replied, "I have heard that loyalty and trustworthiness are the noble conduct of a scholar, while deceit and falsehood are the base behavior of a scholar. What I am about to say is neither deceitful nor false. I beg to go and persuade the King of Qin on Your Majesty's behalf, so that Qin will not send troops against Yan, and Yan may yet obtain precious treasures—this is my wish. If Qin does not comply, I am willing to let the blood from my neck stain the hem of Your Majesty's robe." The King of Yan said, "Well said." Su Dai then journeyed to Qin and addressed King Zhaoxiang of Qin, saying, "I have heard that an enlightened sovereign does not detest loyal words, and a wise ruler does not reject forthright remonstrance. Now, though the state of Yan is small, its aspirations are far-reaching, and its strength is sufficient to defend itself. If Your Majesty seeks to attack Yan, I fear the other feudal lords may harbor divergent intentions. It would be better to forge a bond of amity with Yan, making it a vassal in the east, to jointly resist the feudal lords. Thus, Qin would have no worries from the east, and the feudal lords would not dare to cast covetous eyes upon Qin." King Zhaoxiang of Qin said, "Well said." Thereupon he ceased military action and formed a bond of amity with Yan.

💡 商战启示录

Su Dai's strategy stands as a classic paradigm of "win-win thinking" and "risk hedging" in modern business negotiation. Rather than directly petitioning the State of Qin to abandon its expansionist ambitions, he reframed the structure of interests, pointing out that a forceful assault on Yan would trigger the "systemic risk" of a united coalition of feudal lords—thereby transforming a "zero-sum game" into a "symbiotic alliance." This mirrors how today's enterprises, when facing competition from industry giants, refrain from head-on confrontation and instead propose "ecosystem cooperation" schemes—such as small and mid-sized tech companies lobbying industry leaders to jointly set standards against external disruptors, or regional brands forging alliances with national platforms, trading channels for security. Su Dai further underwrote his proposal with the extreme pledge of "neck blood staining one's robes," which in essence represents a prototype of the modern "bet-on agreement" in commerce: using personal credibility or core assets as performance guarantees to reduce the counterparty's cost of trust. And although the King of Yan harbored suspicions of "deceitfulness," he nonetheless authorized Su Dai—reflecting how leaders must weigh risk against opportunity, just as a CEO confronted with an external advisor's aggressive strategy must assess its feasibility rather than prejudge its motives. In the end, Su Dai achieved his objective without losing a single soldier or horse, delivering a cautionary lesson for modern commercial warfare: the most brilliant offense is to eliminate the necessity of offense, and the most impregnable moat is to make your rival believe that cooperation with you is more advantageous than confrontation.