The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence of human activity. However, critics contend that the term oversimplifies complex human-environment interactions and may inadvertently legitimize destructive practices by framing them as a natural progression. They advocate for a more nuanced understanding that emphasizes historical power dynamics and ecological resilience. This debate reflects broader tensions in scientific classification, where definitions not only describe reality but also shape policy and public perception.
❓ この文章で言及されている意見の相違の主な点は何ですか?
A. A. 人新世が地質時代として考慮されるべきかどうか
B. B. 大気中の二酸化炭素濃度を最適に測定する方法
C. C. 層序記録におけるプラスチック汚染の役割
D. D. 「人新世」という用語が人間と環境の複雑性を適切に捉えているかどうか
✅ 正确答案
D. Whether the term 'Anthropocene' adequately captures human-environment complexities
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first