The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been a subject of debate in geography. This theory posits that human behavior and societal development are largely shaped by the physical environment, such as climate and terrain. Proponents argue that tropical climates, with their abundant resources and lack of seasonal variation, may have hindered technological innovation due to the absence of pressure to adapt. Conversely, temperate zones, characterized by distinct seasons, are believed to have fostered more dynamic societies by necessitating planning and resource management. However, critics contend that this perspective oversimplifies complex human-environment interactions, ignoring cultural, historical, and economic factors. They point to the rapid industrialization of tropical nations like Singapore as evidence against strict determinism. The debate highlights the delicate balance between environmental influence and human agency, reminding us that geography is not destiny but rather one variable among many.
❓ 본문에서 언급된 환경 결정론에 대한 주요 비판은 무엇인가?
A. 그것은 인간의 창의성과 문화적 요소의 역할을 무시한다.
B. 기후가 기술에 미치는 영향을 과도하게 강조한다.
C. 그것은 온대 국가들의 성공을 설명하지 못한다.
D. 역사적 사례에 너무 크게 의존한다.
✅ 正确答案
It ignores the role of human creativity and cultural factors.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first