The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been a subject of debate among geographers. This theory posits that human behavior and societal development are largely shaped by the physical environment, such as climate, topography, and available resources. Proponents argue that civilizations in temperate zones, with moderate climates and fertile soils, are more likely to develop complex agricultural systems and, consequently, advanced social structures. In contrast, regions with extreme climates, such as deserts or polar areas, may impose severe constraints on human activity, leading to less technological innovation. However, critics contend that this perspective oversimplifies the relationship between environment and culture, ignoring the role of human agency, historical contingencies, and technological adaptations. They cite examples like the Inuit, whose sophisticated survival techniques in the Arctic challenge deterministic assumptions. Thus, while the environment undeniably influences human societies, its impact is mediated by cultural and technological factors, making strict determinism untenable.
❓ 본문에서 언급된 비평가들의 주요 주장은 무엇인가?
A. 환경은 사회 발전의 유일한 결정 요인이다.
B. 인간의 주체성과 기술은 환경적 제약을 극복할 수 있다.
C. 온대 기후는 항상 고도로 발달한 문명을 이끈다.
D. 이누이트족은 환경 결정론에 대한 유일한 예외이다.
✅ 正确答案
Human agency and technology can overcome environmental constraints.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first