The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been a subject of debate among geographers. This theory posits that the physical environment, particularly climate and topography, directly shapes human culture, economic activities, and even societal development. Early proponents, such as Ellsworth Huntington, argued that temperate climates fostered advanced civilizations, while tropical regions were seen as hindering progress. However, modern scholarship has largely rejected this deterministic view, emphasizing instead the role of human agency, technological innovation, and historical contingency. Critics point out that environmental determinism oversimplifies complex interactions and has been used to justify colonialism and racial hierarchies. Today, researchers prefer frameworks like 'possibilism', which acknowledges environmental constraints but highlights human adaptability and choice. This shift reflects a broader trend in social sciences towards more nuanced, multi-causal explanations of human-environment relationships.
❓ 현대 학자들이 환경 결정론을 거부하는 주요 이유는 무엇인가?
A. 기후가 사회를 형성하는 역할을 무시한다.
B. 이는 환경적 영향을 과장하고 인간의 주체성과 복잡성을 간과한다.
C. 헌팅턴과 같은 초기 지리학자들에 의해서만 제안되었을 뿐이다.
D. 기술 혁신에 너무 초점을 맞추고 있다.
✅ 正确答案
It overstates environmental influence and neglects human agency and complexity.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first