The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental circles, referring to the current epoch in which human activity has become the dominant influence on the Earth's climate and ecosystems. While some scientists argue for its formal recognition as a distinct geological period, others contend that the term remains more useful as a cultural or historical descriptor rather than a strictly scientific one. Proponents point to unmistakable markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels as evidence of a planetary-scale human footprint. Critics, however, emphasize that geological epochs are typically defined over spans of thousands to millions of years, making it difficult to assess the permanence of recent changes. Moreover, they argue that the term may inadvertently obscure the uneven responsibility for environmental degradation, as it implies a collective human agency that overlooks disparities between industrialized and developing nations. This debate underscores the tension between scientific precision and the need for a powerful narrative to address global environmental crises.
❓ 지문에 따르면, '인류세'라는 용어에 대한 비판자들이 제기하는 주요 우려는 무엇인가?
A. A. 해당 용어는 장기적인 지질학적 기록을 인정하지 못한다.
B. B. 이 용어는 모든 인간이 환경 파괴에 대해 동등한 책임을 공유한다는 것을 시사한다.
C. C. 해당 용어는 어떠한 경험적 증거로도 뒷받침되지 않는다.
D. D. 그 용어는 너무 과학적이어서 공개 담론에서 사용되기 어렵다.
✅ 正确答案
B. The term suggests that all humans share equal blame for environmental damage.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first