The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental circles, referring to the current epoch in which human activity has become the dominant influence on the Earth's climate and ecosystems. While some scientists argue for its formal recognition as a distinct geological period, others contend that the term remains more useful as a cultural or historical descriptor rather than a strictly scientific one. Proponents point to unmistakable markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels as evidence of a planetary-scale human footprint. Critics, however, emphasize that geological epochs are typically defined over spans of thousands to millions of years, making it difficult to assess the permanence of recent changes. Moreover, they argue that the term may inadvertently obscure the uneven responsibility for environmental degradation, as it implies a collective human agency that overlooks disparities between industrialized and developing nations. This debate underscores the tension between scientific precision and the need for a powerful narrative to address global environmental crises.
❓ この文章によると、「人新世」という用語に対する批判者たちが提起する主な懸念は何ですか?
A. A. この用語は長期的な地質学的記録を認識できていない。
B. B. この用語は、すべての人間が環境破壊に対して同等の責任を負うことを示唆している。
C. C. この用語は、いかなる実証的証拠によっても裏付けられていない。
D. D. この用語は科学的すぎて、公の議論で使用するには適さない。
✅ 正确答案
B. The term suggests that all humans share equal blame for environmental damage.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first