The concept of 'emotional intelligence' (EI), popularized by Daniel Goleman in the 1990s, has been subject to considerable academic scrutiny. While proponents argue that EI is a crucial predictor of workplace success and interpersonal relationships, critics question its validity as a distinct construct, suggesting that it overlaps significantly with existing personality traits such as conscientiousness and agreeableness. Recent meta-analyses indicate that ability-based measures of EI, which assess actual cognitive processing of emotions, show incremental validity over personality and cognitive ability in predicting job performance, particularly in roles requiring high social interaction. However, trait-based measures, which rely on self-report, remain vulnerable to social desirability bias and correlate weakly with objective outcomes. Thus, the academic consensus increasingly favors a nuanced view: EI is not a monolithic skill, but a multifaceted domain whose utility depends on the measurement method and the specific context of application.
❓ According to the passage, what is the current academic perspective on emotional intelligence?
A. A) EI is universally accepted as a distinct and reliable predictor of success in all job roles.
B. B) The usefulness of EI depends on how it is measured and the situation in which it is applied.
C. C) Trait-based measures of EI are more accurate than ability-based measures in predicting job performance.
D. D) Critics have completely dismissed EI as irrelevant due to its overlap with personality traits.
✅ 正确答案
B) The usefulness of EI depends on how it is measured and the situation in which it is applied.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first