The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by humanity's profound impact on Earth's systems. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels represent a distinct stratigraphic signature, warranting formal recognition. However, critics contend that the term oversimplifies complex human-environment interactions and that its formal adoption could obscure the uneven responsibilities of different societies for environmental change. They also note that geological time scales typically span millions of years, making the current human influence a mere instant in the planet's history. Despite these debates, the Anthropocene concept has proven valuable beyond geology, prompting interdisciplinary discussions about sustainability, ethics, and the long-term consequences of industrialization.
❓ Какова основная точка разногласий среди критиков относительно официального признания антропоцена геологической эпохой?
A. A) Он не учитывает долгосрочные выгоды индустриализации.
B. B) Он игнорирует различный вклад разных обществ в изменение окружающей среды.
C. C) Он переоценивает влияние человеческой деятельности на системы Земли.
D. D) Отсутствуют какие-либо научные доказательства, подтверждающие предложенные маркеры.
✅ 正确答案
B) It ignores the varying contributions of different societies to environmental change.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first