The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by humanity's profound impact on Earth's systems. Proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels represent a distinct stratigraphic signature, warranting formal recognition. However, critics contend that the term oversimplifies complex human-environment interactions and that its formal adoption could obscure the uneven responsibilities of different societies for environmental change. They also note that geological time scales typically span millions of years, making the current human influence a mere instant in the planet's history. Despite these debates, the Anthropocene concept has proven valuable beyond geology, prompting interdisciplinary discussions about sustainability, ethics, and the long-term consequences of industrialization.
❓ 비판자들 사이에서 인류세를 지질학적 시대로 공식 인정하는 것에 대한 주요 쟁점은 무엇인가?
A. A) 그것은 산업화의 장기적 이점을 설명하지 못한다.
B. B) 이는 다양한 사회들이 환경 변화에 기여하는 정도가 서로 다르다는 점을 무시한다.
C. C) 그것은 지구 시스템에 대한 인간 활동의 영향을 과대평가한다.
D. D) 제안된 지표들을 뒷받침할 과학적 증거가 전혀 없다.
✅ 正确答案
B) It ignores the varying contributions of different societies to environmental change.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first