The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental circles, yet its formal recognition as a new epoch remains contentious. Proponents argue that human activities, such as nuclear testing and plastic pollution, have left indelible markers in the sedimentary record, justifying a distinct geological boundary. Critics, however, contend that the term conflates a relatively brief period of human impact with the vast timescales of deep Earth history, and that such a designation may oversimplify the complex, diachronous nature of human-induced changes. This debate underscores a fundamental tension between scientific classification and the broader societal implications of naming our current era, as the label itself influences policy and public perception of environmental urgency.
❓ 批評家たちが人新世を新たな地質時代として正式に認識することに反対する主な理由は何ですか?
A. A. 人間の影響は地層に記録されるほど顕著ではない。
B. B. この用語は、人間が引き起こす変化の多様性や非同時性を捉えることができない。
C. C. 地質学界は、核実験やプラスチック汚染に関する十分な証拠を欠いている。
D. D. 人新世を認識することは、環境政策の策定を妨げるだろう。
✅ 正确答案
B. The term fails to capture the varied and non-synchronous nature of human-induced changes.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first