The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been a subject of debate among geographers. This theory posits that the physical environment, particularly climate and topography, directly shapes human behavior, cultural development, and societal structures. Proponents argue that civilizations in temperate zones, with their moderate climates and fertile soils, were more likely to develop advanced agriculture and complex political systems, while those in extreme environments faced constraints that limited technological progress. However, critics contend that this perspective oversimplifies the relationship between nature and culture, ignoring the role of human innovation, historical contingencies, and external influences. They cite examples of societies thriving in seemingly inhospitable regions, such as the Inuit in the Arctic or the Bedouins in deserts, who adapted creatively to their surroundings. Modern scholarship tends to favor a more nuanced view, acknowledging environmental influences without resorting to simplistic causality. This shift reflects a broader trend in social sciences toward recognizing the agency of human groups in shaping their own destinies, even within natural constraints.
❓ 이 글의 주요 요점은 무엇인가?
A. A. 환경 결정론은 현대 지리학자들에 의해 널리 받아들여지고 있다.
B. B. 환경 결정론에 대한 비판자들은 인간의 혁신이 어떤 환경적 한계도 극복할 수 있다고 믿는다.
C. C. 환경 결정론에 대한 논쟁은 인간 사회에서 환경의 역할에 대한 보다 세밀한 이해를 이끌어 냈다.
D. D. 온대 지역의 문명은 항상 극한 기후 지역의 문명보다 더 발전된 사회를 이루었다.
✅ 正确答案
C. The debate over environmental determinism has led to a more nuanced understanding of the environment's role in human societies.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first