The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained considerable traction in geological and environmental circles, though its formal recognition as a new epoch remains contentious. Proponents argue that human activities, particularly since the mid-20th century, have left a distinct and permanent marker in the stratigraphic record, such as radioactive isotopes from nuclear tests and microplastics in sedimentary layers. Conversely, critics contend that geological time scales are far too vast for such a recent and relatively thin layer to warrant a separate epoch, suggesting instead that these changes might be better classified as a 'geological event' within the Holocene. This debate underscores a fundamental tension between the precise, empirical standards of stratigraphy and the broader, more urgent narrative of human impact on Earth's systems.
❓ passageの中で述べられている人新世の支持者と批判者の間の主な意見の相違点は何ですか?
A. A. 人間の活動が地球の地質に永久的な変化を引き起こしたかどうか。
B. B. 人類の影響に関する地質学的証拠が、新たな時代を定義するほど重要であるかどうか。
C. C. 放射性同位体とマイクロプラスチックのどちらが人間の影響を示す指標としてより信頼できるか。
D. D. 完新世が終わったのか、それとも現在まで続いているのか。
✅ 正确答案
B. Whether the geological evidence for human impact is significant enough to define a new epoch.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first