The concept of 'planned obsolescence' has long been a cornerstone of consumer electronics manufacturing, yet its environmental and economic implications are increasingly under scrutiny. Proponents argue that deliberate design for a limited lifespan stimulates innovation and maintains affordable entry-level prices, thereby driving market growth. Critics, however, contend that this practice accelerates resource depletion and burdens waste management systems, particularly with the rise of e-waste. Recent legislative efforts in the European Union, such as the 'right to repair' directives, aim to counteract this trend by mandating longer product lifespans and accessible spare parts. Such regulations, while potentially increasing initial production costs, are posited to yield long-term savings for consumers and reduce environmental harm. Nevertheless, the balance between technological advancement and sustainability remains a contentious policy challenge, requiring nuanced solutions that consider both economic vitality and ecological responsibility.
❓ What is the main argument presented by critics of planned obsolescence?
A. It leads to higher initial costs for manufacturers.
B. It accelerates resource depletion and increases waste management issues.
C. It reduces the need for innovation in consumer electronics.
D. It makes products more affordable for low-income consumers.
✅ 正确答案
It accelerates resource depletion and increases waste management issues.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first