The concept of 'planned obsolescence' has long been a cornerstone of consumer electronics manufacturing, yet its environmental and economic implications are increasingly under scrutiny. Proponents argue that deliberate design for a limited lifespan stimulates innovation and maintains affordable entry-level prices, thereby driving market growth. Critics, however, contend that this practice accelerates resource depletion and burdens waste management systems, particularly with the rise of e-waste. Recent legislative efforts in the European Union, such as the 'right to repair' directives, aim to counteract this trend by mandating longer product lifespans and accessible spare parts. Such regulations, while potentially increasing initial production costs, are posited to yield long-term savings for consumers and reduce environmental harm. Nevertheless, the balance between technological advancement and sustainability remains a contentious policy challenge, requiring nuanced solutions that consider both economic vitality and ecological responsibility.
❓ 批评者针对计划性淘汰提出的主要论点是什么?
A. 这导致制造商面临更高的初始成本。
B. 它加速了资源枯竭,并加剧了废弃物管理问题。
C. 它降低了对消费电子产品创新的需求。
D. 它使低收入消费者更能负担得起产品。
✅ 正确答案
It accelerates resource depletion and increases waste management issues.