The concept of 'ecological footprint' has become a central tool in sustainability studies, quantifying the demands placed on Earth's ecosystems by human activities. It measures the area of biologically productive land and water required to produce the resources consumed and to assimilate the wastes generated. While this metric offers a clear, standardized way to compare consumption across nations, critics argue that it oversimplifies complex environmental impacts, overlooking factors such as toxicity of pollutants and biodiversity loss. Moreover, the footprint does not account for technological innovations that might reduce future resource use. Despite these limitations, its visual appeal and ease of communication have made it influential in policy discussions and public awareness campaigns, prompting debates on how to balance economic growth with ecological limits.
❓ 본문에서 언급된 생태발자국에 대한 주요 비판은 무엇인가?
A. 정책 결정자들이 이해하기에는 너무 복잡하다.
B. 이는 특정 환경 피해와 미래의 기술 변화를 포착하지 못한다.
C. 그것은 인간 활동이 생태계에 미치는 영향을 과장한다.
D. 이는 국가 간 표준화된 비교를 제공하지 않습니다.
✅ 正确答案
It fails to capture certain environmental damages and future technological changes.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first