The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental circles, positing that human activities have become a dominant force shaping Earth's geology and ecosystems. While the term remains unofficial in the formal geological timescale, its proponents argue that markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels are indelible signatures of a new epoch. Critics, however, contend that the term oversimplifies the complex, uneven nature of human impact, which varies greatly across different regions and historical periods. They also emphasize that focusing on a single global stratum may obscure the responsibilities of specific industrial nations. Despite this debate, the Anthropocene serves as a powerful heuristic, prompting interdisciplinary research and public discourse on humanity's lasting legacy on the planet.
❓ 本文によると、次のうち「人新世」という用語に対する批判はどれか。
A. それは、地域や時代による人間の影響の不均等な分布を考慮に入れていない。
B. 核降下物の地質学的指標としての役割を過度に強調している。
C. 地質学界では証拠不足のため、受け入れられていない。
D. これは、環境変化に関する学際的研究を阻害するものである。
✅ 正确答案
It fails to account for the uneven distribution of human impacts across regions and time.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first