The concept of 'environmental justice' has evolved significantly since its emergence in the 1980s, when it primarily addressed the disproportionate siting of hazardous waste facilities in low-income and minority communities. Over time, the term has broadened to encompass a wider range of issues, including climate change impacts, access to clean water and air, and the unequal distribution of environmental benefits such as parks and green spaces. Scholars argue that this expansion is both necessary and problematic. On one hand, it highlights systemic inequalities that affect vulnerable populations globally. On the other hand, critics contend that the term has become so diffuse that it risks losing its analytical precision, making it harder to design targeted policy interventions. Despite these debates, the core principle remains: all people, regardless of race, income, or geography, deserve equal protection from environmental harms and equal access to environmental resources. This principle has driven grassroots movements and influenced international agreements, yet implementation gaps persist, particularly in developing nations where regulatory frameworks are weak.
❓ 批評家たちが「環境正義」の進化に関して提起する主な懸念は何ですか?
A. この用語はあまりにも狭義になり、気候変動の問題を除外している。
B. B) この用語はあまりにも広範に拡大されたため、政策上の有用性を失う可能性がある。
C. C) 草の根運動は国際的な協定によって弱められてきた。
D. D) 発展途上国は環境正義の原則を拒否している。
✅ 正确答案
B) The term has expanded so broadly that it may lose its usefulness for policy.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first