The concept of 'environmental justice' has evolved significantly since its emergence in the 1980s, when it primarily addressed the disproportionate siting of hazardous waste facilities in low-income and minority communities. Over time, the term has broadened to encompass a wider range of issues, including climate change impacts, access to clean water and air, and the unequal distribution of environmental benefits such as parks and green spaces. Scholars argue that this expansion is both necessary and problematic. On one hand, it highlights systemic inequalities that affect vulnerable populations globally. On the other hand, critics contend that the term has become so diffuse that it risks losing its analytical precision, making it harder to design targeted policy interventions. Despite these debates, the core principle remains: all people, regardless of race, income, or geography, deserve equal protection from environmental harms and equal access to environmental resources. This principle has driven grassroots movements and influenced international agreements, yet implementation gaps persist, particularly in developing nations where regulatory frameworks are weak.
❓ 批评者对于“环境正义”演变所提出的主要关切是什么?
A. 该术语已变得过于狭隘,未能涵盖气候变化议题。
B. B) 该术语的涵盖范围已扩展得过于宽泛,以至于可能对政策制定失去其实用性。
C. C) 基层运动因国际协议而受到削弱。
D. D) 发展中国家拒绝了环境正义原则。
✅ 正确答案
B) The term has expanded so broadly that it may lose its usefulness for policy.