The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in organizational psychology as a framework for understanding why some individuals adapt more effectively to cross-cultural contexts than others. Unlike general intelligence or emotional intelligence, CQ specifically encompasses four distinct dimensions: metacognitive, cognitive, motivational, and behavioral. Metacognitive CQ refers to the conscious awareness of cultural assumptions during interactions, while cognitive CQ involves knowledge of norms and practices in different cultures. Motivational CQ reflects the intrinsic interest and confidence in adapting to culturally diverse settings, and behavioral CQ pertains to the capability to exhibit appropriate verbal and non-verbal actions. Research suggests that high CQ predicts better job performance in multinational teams, yet it is not a fixed trait; targeted training can enhance all four components, particularly when combined with immersive experiences. However, critics argue that existing measures of CQ rely heavily on self-reporting, which may inflate scores due to social desirability bias, thus questioning the validity of empirical findings.
❓ 根据文章所述,以下哪项是当前文化智力研究的局限性?
A. A. 它忽视了动机因素的作用。
B. B. 它依赖于可能存在偏差的自我报告评估。
C. C. 它过于关注行为方面的内容。
D. D. 它没有考虑训练的影响。
✅ 正确答案
B. It relies on self-reported assessments that may be biased.