The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been debated in geography. Early proponents argued that human behavior and societal development were largely shaped by climatic conditions and physical geography. However, this perspective was criticized for oversimplifying complex human-environment interactions and for justifying colonial narratives. Modern scholarship, such as the work of Jared Diamond, revisits this idea with nuance, suggesting that geographic factors can influence the availability of resources and the spread of technologies, yet emphasizing that these factors are not deterministic. Instead, contemporary researchers advocate for a 'possibilist' approach, where the environment offers a set of possibilities and constraints, but human agency and cultural choices play a crucial role in shaping outcomes. This shift reflects a broader trend toward recognizing the dynamic and reciprocal relationship between societies and their environments.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 초기 환경 결정론과 현대 학문의 주요 차이점은 무엇인가?
A. 현대 학계는 지리학이 인간 사회에 미치는 영향에 대해 완전히 부정한다.
B. 현대 학계는 지리학을 고정된 결과보다는 가능성을 제공하는 학문으로 본다.
C. 초기 결정론은 환경적 요인보다 인간의 주체성을 강조했다.
D. 현대 학계는 기술과 자원의 역할을 무시하고 있다.
✅ 正确答案
Modern scholarship views geography as offering possibilities rather than fixed outcomes.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first