The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental discourse, referring to the current epoch in which human activities have become the dominant influence on the Earth's climate and ecosystems. While the term was popularized by atmospheric chemist Paul Crutzen in 2000, its formal recognition as a geological epoch remains contentious. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence. Critics, however, contend that these changes are not yet comparable to the natural transitions that defined previous epochs, such as the Pleistocene-Holocene boundary. Furthermore, debates persist over the epoch's start date, with suggestions ranging from the advent of agriculture to the mid-20th century 'Great Acceleration.' This ambiguity raises fundamental questions about how humanity's impact can be systematically measured and whether the Anthropocene represents a genuine geological shift or a cultural metaphor for environmental anxiety.
❓ 과학자들 사이에서 인류세에 관한 주요 의견 차이는 무엇인가?
A. A. 인간의 활동이 환경에 어떤 영향을 미치는지 여부.
B. B. 해당 용어가 대중적 담론에서 사용되어야 하는지, 아니면 학술적 영역에서만 사용되어야 하는지의 여부.
C. C. 그것이 공식적인 지질 시대(epoch)로 인정될 자격이 있는지, 그리고 그렇다면 언제 시작되었는지.
D. D. 플라스틱 오염과 핵 낙진이 중요한 환경 문제인지 여부.
✅ 正确答案
C. Whether it qualifies as a formal geological epoch and, if so, when it began.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first