The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental discourse, referring to the current epoch in which human activities have become the dominant influence on the Earth's climate and ecosystems. While the term was popularized by atmospheric chemist Paul Crutzen in 2000, its formal recognition as a geological epoch remains contentious. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout, and elevated carbon dioxide levels provide clear stratigraphic evidence. Critics, however, contend that these changes are not yet comparable to the natural transitions that defined previous epochs, such as the Pleistocene-Holocene boundary. Furthermore, debates persist over the epoch's start date, with suggestions ranging from the advent of agriculture to the mid-20th century 'Great Acceleration.' This ambiguity raises fundamental questions about how humanity's impact can be systematically measured and whether the Anthropocene represents a genuine geological shift or a cultural metaphor for environmental anxiety.
❓ 科学者たちの間で、人新世に関する意見の相違の主な点は何ですか?
A. A. 人間の活動が環境に何らかの影響を及ぼすかどうか。
B. B. その用語が一般的な言説で使用されるべきか、それとも学術的な場に限定されるべきか。
C. C. それが正式な地質時代として認められるかどうか、また認められる場合、その始まりはいつか。
D. D. プラスチック汚染と核の降下物が重大な環境問題であるかどうか。
✅ 正确答案
C. Whether it qualifies as a formal geological epoch and, if so, when it began.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first