The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been a subject of debate among geographers. This theory posits that the physical environment, particularly climate and topography, directly shapes human culture, economic activities, and even societal development. Early proponents, such as Ellsworth Huntington, argued that temperate climates fostered higher levels of civilization, while tropical regions were seen as inherently less conducive to progress. However, this perspective has been heavily criticized for its oversimplification and potential to justify colonialism and racial prejudice. Modern scholarship emphasizes a more nuanced interaction between environment and human agency, suggesting that while environmental factors can constrain or enable certain choices, they do not determine outcomes. Instead, technological innovation, cultural values, and historical contingencies play equally vital roles in shaping societies, leading to a more dynamic and less fatalistic understanding of human-environment relations.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 초기 환경 결정론에 대한 주요 비판은 무엇인가?
A. 그것은 사회 발전에 있어 기후의 역할을 무시했다.
B. 그것은 환경과 사회 사이의 관계를 지나치게 단순화했으며, 부당한 이데올로기를 지지할 수 있었다.
C. 기술 혁신에 너무 많은 초점을 맞췄다.
D. 그것은 환경이 인간 문화에 미치는 어떠한 영향도 부인했다.
✅ 正确答案
It oversimplified the relationship between environment and society and could support unjust ideologies.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first