The concept of 'environmental determinism' has long been a subject of debate among geographers. This theory posits that the physical environment, particularly climate and topography, directly shapes human culture, economic activities, and even societal development. Early proponents, such as Ellsworth Huntington, argued that temperate climates fostered higher levels of civilization, while tropical regions were seen as inherently less conducive to progress. However, this perspective has been heavily criticized for its oversimplification and potential to justify colonialism and racial prejudice. Modern scholarship emphasizes a more nuanced interaction between environment and human agency, suggesting that while environmental factors can constrain or enable certain choices, they do not determine outcomes. Instead, technological innovation, cultural values, and historical contingencies play equally vital roles in shaping societies, leading to a more dynamic and less fatalistic understanding of human-environment relations.
❓ 文章によると、初期の環境決定論に対する主な批判は何ですか?
A. それは社会発展における気候の役割を無視していた。
B. それは環境と社会の関係を過度に単純化し、不当なイデオロギーを支持する可能性があった。
C. 技術革新に焦点を当てすぎていた。
D. それは環境が人間の文化に与える影響を一切否定した。
✅ 正确答案
It oversimplified the relationship between environment and society and could support unjust ideologies.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first