The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in organizational psychology as a framework for understanding cross-cultural effectiveness. Unlike emotional intelligence, which focuses on intrapersonal and interpersonal skills within a familiar cultural context, CQ specifically addresses the capability to function effectively in culturally diverse settings. Researchers have identified four distinct components of CQ: metacognitive (conscious awareness of cultural assumptions), cognitive (knowledge of cultural norms and practices), motivational (interest and confidence in adapting), and behavioral (flexibility in verbal and non-verbal actions). Studies suggest that CQ predicts success in international assignments and multicultural teamwork better than general cognitive ability or personality traits. However, critics argue that CQ's measurement often relies on self-report, which may not accurately reflect actual performance, and that the construct overlaps with existing concepts like openness to experience. Despite these debates, CQ remains a valuable practical tool for training global managers.
❓ 文章によると、批評家が指摘する文化的知性(CQ)の主な限界は何ですか?
A. それは感情的知性とあまりにも似ている。
B. これは国際的な赴任における成功を予測するものではありません。
C. 自己申告によるため、その測定値は実際の業績を反映しない可能性があります。
D. 効果的な異文化間機能のための明確な構成要素が欠けている。
✅ 正确答案
Its measurement may not reflect actual performance due to self-reporting.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first