The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in organizational psychology as a framework for understanding cross-cultural effectiveness. Unlike emotional intelligence, which focuses on intrapersonal and interpersonal skills within a familiar cultural context, CQ specifically addresses the capability to function effectively in culturally diverse settings. Researchers have identified four distinct components of CQ: metacognitive (conscious awareness of cultural assumptions), cognitive (knowledge of cultural norms and practices), motivational (interest and confidence in adapting), and behavioral (flexibility in verbal and non-verbal actions). Studies suggest that CQ predicts success in international assignments and multicultural teamwork better than general cognitive ability or personality traits. However, critics argue that CQ's measurement often relies on self-report, which may not accurately reflect actual performance, and that the construct overlaps with existing concepts like openness to experience. Despite these debates, CQ remains a valuable practical tool for training global managers.
❓ 根据文章所述,批评者提到的文化智力(CQ)的一个关键局限性是什么?
A. 这与情商过于相似。
B. 它并不能预测在国际任务中的成功。
C. 其测量结果可能因自我报告而无法反映实际表现。
D. 它缺乏有效跨文化运作所需的明确组成部分。
✅ 正确答案
Its measurement may not reflect actual performance due to self-reporting.