The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists and environmental scientists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Proponents argue that markers such as plastic pollution, nuclear fallout, and accelerated species extinction clearly distinguish this period from the Holocene, which began about 11,700 years ago. However, critics contend that the term is more cultural than scientific, as the human footprint is not uniform across time or space, and formalizing it may oversimplify complex natural processes. This debate underscores the challenge of integrating human agency into geological classification systems that traditionally rely on natural, stratigraphic evidence.
❓ 本文によると、一部の科学者が人新世を地質時代として正式に定めることに反対する主な理由は何か。
A. A. 人間の影響を示す証拠はあまりにも乏しく、測定することはできない。
B. B. その概念は一貫した自然の証拠ではなく、文化的な指標に依存している。
C. C. 完新世はすでに終わっており、比較することはできない。
D. D. 人間活動はまだ重大な環境変化を引き起こしていない。
✅ 正确答案
B. The concept relies on cultural markers rather than consistent natural evidence.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first