The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Unlike previous epochs, which were delineated by natural climate shifts or biological events, the Anthropocene is characterized by markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels. Proponents argue that these human-induced changes are so profound and lasting that they warrant a distinct stratigraphic boundary. However, critics contend that the term oversimplifies the complex and uneven nature of human influence, suggesting that a more nuanced framework is needed to capture regional variations in environmental modification. This debate highlights a fundamental tension between the desire for a clear scientific classification and the messy reality of anthropogenic change.
❓ 본문에서 언급된 의견 차이의 핵심은 무엇인가?
A. 인간 활동이 지속적인 환경 변화를 초래했는지 여부.
B. 인류세(Anthropocene)가 별개의 지질학적 시대로 간주되어야 하는지 여부.
C. 핵 낙진과 플라스틱 오염이 중요한 지표인지 여부.
D. 현대 시대에도 자연적 기후 변동이 여전히 발생하는지 여부.
✅ 正确答案
Whether the Anthropocene should be considered a distinct geological epoch.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first