The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained traction among geologists as a proposed new geological epoch defined by significant human impact on Earth's geology and ecosystems. Unlike previous epochs, which were delineated by natural climate shifts or biological events, the Anthropocene is characterized by markers such as nuclear fallout, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels. Proponents argue that these human-induced changes are so profound and lasting that they warrant a distinct stratigraphic boundary. However, critics contend that the term oversimplifies the complex and uneven nature of human influence, suggesting that a more nuanced framework is needed to capture regional variations in environmental modification. This debate highlights a fundamental tension between the desire for a clear scientific classification and the messy reality of anthropogenic change.
❓ この文章で言及されている意見の相違の主な点は何ですか？
A. 人間の活動が何らかの永続的な環境変化を引き起こしたかどうか。
B. アントロポセン（人新世）を独立した地質時代として扱うべきかどうか。
C. 核降下物とプラスチック汚染が重要な指標であるかどうか。
D. 現代においても自然の気候変動が依然として発生するかどうか。
✅ 正确答案
Whether the Anthropocene should be considered a distinct geological epoch.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first