The concept of 'environmental carrying capacity' has long been central to ecological studies, yet its application to human societies remains contentious. Traditional models assume a linear relationship between population size and resource depletion, but recent research suggests that technological innovation and social adaptation can temporarily raise this threshold. However, such adjustments often lead to a 'rebound effect,' where increased efficiency encourages greater consumption, ultimately accelerating resource exhaustion. This paradox highlights the limitations of purely quantitative approaches in predicting sustainability. Instead, scholars argue for a qualitative framework that incorporates cultural values, institutional flexibility, and ethical considerations. Without such interdisciplinary integration, policy measures based solely on carrying capacity estimates may inadvertently exacerbate the very crises they aim to prevent.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 전통적 수용력 모델에 대한 주요 비판은 무엇인가?
A. A. 그들은 기술 혁신이 자원 효율성을 높이는 데 있어서의 역할을 무시한다.
B. B. 그들은 사회적 적응이 자원 부족을 영구적으로 해결할 가능성을 고려하지 못한다.
C. C. 그들은 효율성과 소비 사이의 복잡한 역학 관계를 포착할 수 없는 양적 방법에 의존한다.
D. D. 그들은 문화적 가치가 환경 지속 가능성에 미치는 영향을 과대평가한다.
✅ 正确答案
C. They rely on quantitative methods that cannot capture the complex dynamics between efficiency and consumption.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first