The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in organizational psychology as a framework for understanding cross-cultural effectiveness. Unlike emotional intelligence, which focuses on intrapersonal and interpersonal abilities within a familiar context, CQ specifically addresses the capability to function and manage effectively in culturally diverse settings. Researchers have identified four distinct dimensions of CQ: metacognitive (conscious awareness during intercultural interactions), cognitive (knowledge of norms and practices in different cultures), motivational (interest and confidence in adapting), and behavioral (ability to exhibit appropriate verbal and nonverbal actions). A growing body of empirical studies suggests that high CQ predicts better job performance, smoother adjustment, and enhanced collaboration in multinational teams, even after controlling for general cognitive ability and personality traits. However, critics caution that many CQ assessments rely on self-reporting, which may inflate scores due to social desirability bias. Future research is therefore urged to incorporate objective performance measures and longitudinal designs to validate CQ's predictive utility across diverse occupational contexts.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 현재 CQ 연구의 주요 한계는 무엇인가?
A. A. 이는 문화 간 성공에 있어 성격 특성의 역할을 지나치게 강조한다.
B. B. 그것은 CQ를 감성 지능과 구별하지 못한다.
C. C. 이는 편향될 수 있는 자기 보고식 측정에 크게 의존한다.
D. D. 다국적 팀에서 테스트되지 않았습니다.
✅ 正确答案
C. It relies heavily on self-reported measures that may be biased.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first