The concept of 'cultural intelligence' (CQ) has gained prominence in organizational psychology as a framework for understanding cross-cultural effectiveness. Unlike emotional intelligence, which focuses on intrapersonal and interpersonal abilities within a familiar context, CQ specifically addresses the capability to function and manage effectively in culturally diverse settings. Researchers have identified four distinct dimensions of CQ: metacognitive (conscious awareness during intercultural interactions), cognitive (knowledge of norms and practices in different cultures), motivational (interest and confidence in adapting), and behavioral (ability to exhibit appropriate verbal and nonverbal actions). A growing body of empirical studies suggests that high CQ predicts better job performance, smoother adjustment, and enhanced collaboration in multinational teams, even after controlling for general cognitive ability and personality traits. However, critics caution that many CQ assessments rely on self-reporting, which may inflate scores due to social desirability bias. Future research is therefore urged to incorporate objective performance measures and longitudinal designs to validate CQ's predictive utility across diverse occupational contexts.
❓ この文章によると、現在のCQ研究の主な限界は何ですか?
A. A. それは、異文化間での成功における人格特性の役割を過度に強調している。
B. B. それはCQを感情的知性と区別することに失敗している。
C. C. 自己報告による測定に大きく依存しており、それが偏っている可能性がある。
D. D. 多国籍チームではテストされていない。
✅ 正确答案
C. It relies heavily on self-reported measures that may be biased.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first