The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental circles, though its formal recognition as a new epoch remains contentious. Proponents argue that human activities, particularly since the mid-20th century, have left a distinct and lasting imprint on Earth's strata, marked by radioactive isotopes from nuclear tests, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels. This 'Great Acceleration' has altered biogeochemical cycles, leading to unprecedented rates of biodiversity loss and climate change. However, critics contend that the term oversimplifies the complex, diachronous nature of human impact, which varies greatly across regions and time periods. They suggest that focusing on a single start date obscures the long history of human-environment interactions, from early agriculture to industrialization. Consequently, the debate is not merely semantic but reflects deeper disagreements about humanity's role in shaping planetary processes and the appropriate scale for environmental governance. Understanding this discourse is crucial for developing effective strategies for sustainability in the face of global change.
❓ 일부 학자들이 인류세를 새로운 지질 시대(지질 연대 단위)로 공식 인정하는 것에 반대하는 주요 이유는 무엇인가?
A. A. 그들은 인간이 지구에 미치는 영향이 지질 층을 변화시킬 만큼 충분히 크지 않다고 믿는다.
B. B. 그들은 그 개념이 인간이 환경에 미치는 영향의 다양하고 역사적인 성격을 포착하지 못한다고 주장한다.
C. C. 그들은 '인류세'라는 용어가 현대의 변화를 더 잘 설명하기 위해 '대가속'으로 대체되어야 한다고 생각한다.
D. D. 그들은 시대의 시작 시점을 20세기 중반이 아닌 초기 농업 시대로 설정해야 한다고 주장한다.
✅ 正确答案
B. They argue that the concept fails to capture the varying and historical nature of human influence on the environment.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first