The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained significant traction in geological and environmental circles, though its formal recognition as a new epoch remains contentious. Proponents argue that human activities, particularly since the mid-20th century, have left a distinct and lasting imprint on Earth's strata, marked by radioactive isotopes from nuclear tests, plastic pollution, and elevated carbon dioxide levels. This 'Great Acceleration' has altered biogeochemical cycles, leading to unprecedented rates of biodiversity loss and climate change. However, critics contend that the term oversimplifies the complex, diachronous nature of human impact, which varies greatly across regions and time periods. They suggest that focusing on a single start date obscures the long history of human-environment interactions, from early agriculture to industrialization. Consequently, the debate is not merely semantic but reflects deeper disagreements about humanity's role in shaping planetary processes and the appropriate scale for environmental governance. Understanding this discourse is crucial for developing effective strategies for sustainability in the face of global change.
❓ 一部の学者が、人新世を新たな地質時代として正式に認定することに反対する主な理由は何ですか?
A. A. 彼らは、人間が地球に与える影響は地質学的な地層を変えるほど重要ではないと信じている。
B. B. 彼らは、その概念が人間による環境への影響の多様かつ歴史的な性質を捉え損ねていると主張する。
C. C. 彼らは、「人新世」という用語は、現代の変化をより適切に表現するために「大加速」に置き換えられるべきだと考えている。
D. D. 彼らは、この時代の開始時期は20世紀半ばではなく、初期農業の時期に設定されるべきだと主張している。
✅ 正确答案
B. They argue that the concept fails to capture the varying and historical nature of human influence on the environment.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first