The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained considerable traction in geological and environmental discourse, though its formal recognition as a new epoch remains contentious. Proponents argue that human activities, particularly since the mid-20th century, have left a distinct and lasting imprint on the planet's stratigraphy, marked by radioactive isotopes from nuclear tests, microplastics, and elevated carbon dioxide levels. Conversely, skeptics contend that such markers are not yet globally uniform or sufficiently persistent to warrant a formal division of the geological timescale. This debate underscores a broader tension between scientific classification and the socio-political implications of acknowledging human impact as a defining force in Earth's history.
❓ Какова основная точка разногласий относительно антропоцена, описанная в отрывке?
A. A) Оказывают ли деятельность человека какое-либо измеримое воздействие на окружающую среду.
B. B) Достаточно ли отличительны и последовательны предлагаемые маркеры антропоцена, чтобы определить новую геологическую эпоху.
C. C) Следует ли заменить термин «антропоцен» на более точное научное название.
D. D) Являются ли социально-политические последствия антропоцена более важными, чем его геологические доказательства.
✅ 正确答案
B) Whether the proposed markers of the Anthropocene are distinct and consistent enough to define a new geological epoch.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first