The concept of the 'Anthropocene' has gained considerable traction in geological and environmental discourse, though its formal recognition as a new epoch remains contentious. Proponents argue that human activities, particularly since the mid-20th century, have left a distinct and lasting imprint on the planet's stratigraphy, marked by radioactive isotopes from nuclear tests, microplastics, and elevated carbon dioxide levels. Conversely, skeptics contend that such markers are not yet globally uniform or sufficiently persistent to warrant a formal division of the geological timescale. This debate underscores a broader tension between scientific classification and the socio-political implications of acknowledging human impact as a defining force in Earth's history.
❓ この文章で述べられている人新世に関する主な論点は何ですか？
A. A) 人間の活動が環境に何らかの測定可能な影響を及ぼしているかどうか。
B. B) 提案された人新世の指標が、新たな地質時代を定義するのに十分に明確かつ一貫しているかどうか。
C. C) 「人新世」という用語を、より正確な科学的名称に置き換えるべきかどうか。
D. D) 人新世の社会政治的含意が、その地質学的証拠よりも重要であるかどうか。
✅ 正确答案
B) Whether the proposed markers of the Anthropocene are distinct and consistent enough to define a new geological epoch.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first