The concept of 'neurodiversity' has gained traction in recent years, challenging the traditional pathologization of conditions such as autism and ADHD. Proponents argue that these neurological variations are natural human differences, not deficits, and should be accommodated rather than cured. This perspective shifts the focus from individual impairment to societal barriers, advocating for inclusive environments that harness diverse cognitive strengths. However, critics caution that romanticizing neurodiversity may downplay the genuine challenges faced by some individuals, particularly those with high support needs. They emphasize the necessity of balanced approaches that respect personal identity while providing appropriate interventions. Ultimately, the debate reflects a broader tension between medical and social models of disability, raising fundamental questions about normality, acceptance, and the ethics of enhancement.
❓ Según el pasaje, ¿cuál es el argumento principal de los defensores de la neurodiversidad?
A. Las condiciones neurológicas deben tratarse principalmente mediante intervención médica.
B. El autismo y el TDAH son variaciones naturales que deben ser aceptadas y adaptadas.
C. Las barreras sociales son menos importantes que los déficits cognitivos individuales.
D. Las personas con altas necesidades de apoyo requieren entornos educativos separados.
✅ 正确答案
Autism and ADHD are natural variations that should be embraced and accommodated.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first