The concept of 'ecological footprint' has gained prominence as a metric for assessing human impact on the environment. It measures the amount of biologically productive land and water area required to produce the resources an individual, population, or activity consumes and to absorb the waste they generate, given prevailing technology and resource management practices. This metric is particularly useful for comparing consumption patterns across different societies, as it translates complex environmental pressures into a single, comprehensible unit: global hectares. However, critics argue that the footprint model oversimplifies ecological realities by neglecting factors such as biodiversity loss and the uneven distribution of environmental degradation. Furthermore, it tends to emphasize consumption over production, potentially overlooking the environmental costs embedded in imported goods. Despite these limitations, the ecological footprint remains a powerful communicative tool, raising awareness about unsustainable lifestyles and prompting policy discussions on resource equity and planetary boundaries.
❓ この文章によると、生態学的フットプリントに対する主な批判の一つは、それが次のことである:
A. A. 輸入品の環境への影響を無視している。
B. B. 生物多様性の喪失と不均一な劣化を考慮していない。
C. C. 生産を過度に重視し、消費を軽視している。
D. D. 政策立案者には複雑すぎて理解できない。
✅ 正确答案
B. Fails to account for biodiversity loss and uneven degradation.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first