The concept of 'ecological footprint' has gained prominence as a metric for assessing human impact on the environment. It measures the amount of biologically productive land and water area required to produce the resources an individual, population, or activity consumes and to absorb the waste they generate, given prevailing technology and resource management practices. This metric is particularly useful for comparing consumption patterns across different societies, as it translates complex environmental pressures into a single, comprehensible unit: global hectares. However, critics argue that the footprint model oversimplifies ecological realities by neglecting factors such as biodiversity loss and the uneven distribution of environmental degradation. Furthermore, it tends to emphasize consumption over production, potentially overlooking the environmental costs embedded in imported goods. Despite these limitations, the ecological footprint remains a powerful communicative tool, raising awareness about unsustainable lifestyles and prompting policy discussions on resource equity and planetary boundaries.
❓ According to the passage, one major criticism of the ecological footprint is that it:
A. A. Ignores the environmental impact of imported goods.
B. B. Fails to account for biodiversity loss and uneven degradation.
C. C. Overemphasizes production rather than consumption.
D. D. Is too complex for policymakers to understand.
✅ 正确答案
B. Fails to account for biodiversity loss and uneven degradation.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first