The concept of 'environmental footprint' has evolved significantly since its introduction in the 1990s. Initially, it focused solely on carbon emissions, but contemporary frameworks incorporate a broader range of ecological impacts, including water usage, land degradation, and biodiversity loss. This shift reflects a growing recognition that sustainability cannot be achieved by addressing a single metric. For instance, a product may have a low carbon footprint yet contribute heavily to water scarcity in its production region. Therefore, comprehensive assessments now employ multi-criteria analysis, which weighs various environmental pressures against each other. However, this approach is not without challenges, as it requires standardized data collection and value judgments about the relative importance of different impacts. Critics argue that such complexity may hinder practical implementation, especially in developing economies where data infrastructure is limited. Nevertheless, proponents maintain that a holistic perspective is essential for informed policy-making and corporate responsibility, ultimately fostering more resilient environmental strategies.
❓ 지문에 따르면, 환경 발자국을 평가하는 현대의 다중 기준 접근법의 주요 한계는 무엇인가?
A. 탄소 배출에 너무 치중하고 있다.
B. 표준화된 데이터와 영향 우선순위에 대한 주관적 판단이 필요하다.
C. 물 사용과 생물다양성 손실을 무시한다.
D. 개발도상국이 적용하기에는 너무 단순하다.
✅ 正确答案
It requires standardized data and subjective judgments about impact priorities.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first