The concept of 'environmental footprint' has evolved significantly since its introduction in the 1990s. Initially, it focused solely on carbon emissions, but contemporary frameworks incorporate a broader range of ecological impacts, including water usage, land degradation, and biodiversity loss. This shift reflects a growing recognition that sustainability cannot be achieved by addressing a single metric. For instance, a product may have a low carbon footprint yet contribute heavily to water scarcity in its production region. Therefore, comprehensive assessments now employ multi-criteria analysis, which weighs various environmental pressures against each other. However, this approach is not without challenges, as it requires standardized data collection and value judgments about the relative importance of different impacts. Critics argue that such complexity may hinder practical implementation, especially in developing economies where data infrastructure is limited. Nevertheless, proponents maintain that a holistic perspective is essential for informed policy-making and corporate responsibility, ultimately fostering more resilient environmental strategies.
❓ 文章によると、環境フットプリントを評価する現代の多基準アプローチの主要な限界は何ですか?
A. 二酸化炭素排出量に重点を置きすぎている。
B. 標準化されたデータと、影響の優先順位に関する主観的な判断が必要である。
C. 水の使用量と生物多様性の損失を無視している。
D. 新興経済国にとって適用するにはあまりにも単純すぎる。
✅ 正确答案
It requires standardized data and subjective judgments about impact priorities.
IELTS Reading Tips
Skim the questions first, underline keywords, then locate in the passage
Watch for paraphrasing; correct answers are often reworded
Be wary of absolute statements (all, always, never) — usually wrong
Pay attention to content after transition words (however, but, yet)
Manage time: about 20 minutes per passage; skip difficult questions first